Everything, Nothing ...

Friday, June 29, 2007

Faculty Position

http://pubs.acs.org/email/cen/html/101206094042.html

Education
September 4, 2006 Volume 84, Number 36 pp. 102-104
10 Tips To Help You Get A Faculty Job
Faculty from around the country share stories to help candidates 'ace' the interview process
Susan R. Morrissey
Every year, numerous graduate students and postdocs carefully prepare their CVs, scour the classified ads looking for open academic faculty positions, and apply to those in their areas of expertise. For a lucky few, their application results in an on-campus interview and an opportunity to wow the hiring institution.

Getty Image
Nerve-Racking Earning a faculty position is not without stress.

Although preparing a knockout CV, blanketing institutions with applications, and waiting to hear about a job prospect are stressful pursuits, the campus interview presents a unique challenge. After all, candidates have only a day or two to convince a panel of established professors that they are up to the task of leading a research project, teaching various courses, and being a valued colleague.

Navigating the interviewing process takes some practice, but there are several things that candidates can do (or avoid doing) to increase their chances of succeeding. To help shed some light for first-time candidates on the dos and don'ts of academic faculty interviewing, C&EN asked several faculty members at large research universities around the country to share their advice based on stories about memorable interviews. The following are the top 10 tips offered by this group, in no particular order.

Tip 1: Use all available resources. It should come as no surprise that the more applications candidates send out, the greater their chances of getting a job. This wisdom holds true for all jobs, including those in academics. But in order to apply, candidates must first find an opening.

A candidate's academic mentor is often a great source of finding open positions in line with one's research interest. A common mistake made by students and postdocs, however, is assuming that their mentors can get them the job, points out Peter J. Stang, organic chemistry professor at the University of Utah. "A mentor can open doors, but the candidate must get the job," he says.

Tip 2: Spend some time learning about the faculty and the university you are visiting. Perhaps hiring a private investigator is going too far, but it's worthwhile to spend some time reading about the research interests of the department faculty and learning details about the university and its surrounding community.

"Not knowing some of the important scientific players in the department, whether the institution is public or private, and a little bit about the local history does not go over well," says Morton Z. Hoffman, chemistry professor emeritus at Boston University. For example, Hoffman notes that one of the candidates who interviewed in his department wasn't completely sure about the difference between Boston University and Boston College, leaving Hoffman to wonder if the candidate knew where he was that day.

Aside from simply knowing where you are, doing your homework on the faculty can come in handy. "One of my favorite anecdotes was when a candidate interviewed for a junior faculty position at Ohio State," says Alan G. Marshall, chemistry and biochemistry professor at Florida State University.

According to Marshall, the most renowned organic chemist in the department asked the candidate to justify the feasibility of one of the reactions in his proposal. "Without missing a beat, the candidate cited one of the faculty member's own publications as rationale," he says. The moral: Candidates should always prime themselves on the research of the faculty at the target institution.

Tip 3: Be polite, professional, and warm. It may seem obvious, but interviewing committees are looking for someone they can connect with and who will represent their department well. They want someone who is not only smart, but also friendly with at least some degree of social skills.

"One of my very good postdocs was having trouble with his interviews," explains Ronald Breslow, chemistry professor at Columbia University. After talking with his colleagues who took part in the interview, Breslow learned that his postdoc was "presenting his work and ideas with a reserved, cool manner."

Breslow worked with his postdoc to help him convey enthusiasm about his work, and after some practice, he was a "roaring success." Even though, as Breslow explains, his postdoc was then perceived as a bit "hyper," he was offered the job.

California Institute of Technology chemistry professor Harry B. Gray tells C&EN a similar story. Gray notes that it's often difficult to judge people in the short span of the interview, and sometimes brilliant people who are perceived as cold are ranked below others who may not be as accomplished professionally but come off well in the interview. The take-home message is to focus on connecting with the faculty in addition to showcasing your scientific knowledge.

Part of connecting with others involves social skills. "Although you can be forgiven for not knowing which fork to use in a multicourse dinner, don't be a boor who exhibits no evidence of any social graces," Hoffman says. "It might be helpful to know something about the world situation and local politics in the event that dinner conversation strays away from a discussion of your latest research result," he advises.

It's also important to be professional and to treat the interview seriously. While he was an organic chemistry professor at the University of South Florida, Douglas J. Raber, consultant with GreenPoint Science, tells C&EN that he once went to the airport to pick up a faculty candidate. As soon as the fellow landed, he asked how far it was to the Everglades. "We soon realized that he really had no interest in the position at USF, but he did want plane fare to visit Florida for a short vacation," Raber explains.

Tip 4: Use a mirror. Again, this may seem like common sense, but stories exist of candidates who gave presentations with their pants unzipped or food in their teeth. These simple faux pas can be distracting and cost a candidate a job offer.

"One candidate had neglected to cut the tacking on the vent in his new suit jacket," says Marcetta Y. Darensbourg, chemistry professor at Texas A&M University. "For some reason, the audience just couldn't focus on the chemistry, knowing that he could have been a little more with it," she notes.

Tip 5: Keep your presentation on target and on time. Aside from the standard presentation tips of not packing slides with lots of words and then reading them to the audience, many of the faculty contacted by C&EN stressed the importance of not running long during presentations.

LeRoy N. Sanchez/Los Alamos National Laboratory
Presenter Effective use of PowerPoint presentations is one key to navigating the interviewing process successfully.

"The candidate should have practiced his or her presentation for timing and content," Darensbourg advises. She recalls a presentation in which a candidate ran over the allotted time by 25 minutes. It was his first interview, she notes, adding that although everyone tends to give the candidates some leeway in their first interview, going too long reflected poorly on the candidate.

Underscoring this point, Hoffman says, "If your seminar is scheduled for a one-hour slot, plan your presentation for 45 minutes to allow for the fact that you are apt to be interrupted by questions and to leave plenty of time for discussion." He adds that "it's bad form to push the schedule so no one can ask questions," because the interviewing faculty might wonder if that was done deliberately.

"Nothing is more exasperating than a candidate who uses up all of his or her time trying to include every possible prior or proposed project and leaving no time for discussion," Marshall agrees. "The question-and-answer period is the best place for a candidate to show his or her ability to think on his or her feet and to demonstrate knowledge going beyond what is on the slide," he explains.

Tip 6: Don't be afraid to add some scientific theater to your presentation. Giving a presentation doesn't have to be a boring run-through of slides. In fact, Darensbourg says when she was interviewing for her position, she brought along a prop. "I carried with me a giant molecular structure that could be used to point out reaction spots, and it gave me a chance for eye contact with the audience as I explained it," she says. And, although PowerPoint presentations have become popular for their razzmatazz appeal, using a prop is still likely to be effective.

Scientific theater can also be brought into a presentation by including a mistake on one of the slides and correcting it during the presentation, notes Roald Hoffmann, chemistry professor at Cornell University. "This gives people the impression that this person is not just reading his or her slides, but that they're thinking as they're giving the talk," he points out.

Tip 7: Don't fake it. Although building in some scientific theater may be helpful, candidates should be careful not to go overboard. Stang tells C&EN that he sees a lot of young candidates using glitzy PowerPoint presentations. "A good PowerPoint is appreciated, but candidates must make sure the glitz doesn't overshadow the science," he cautions.

In the end, the interviewing faculty are looking for a candidate who knows his or her science. "Don't try to dazzle the interviewing committee," Hoffman notes. "Faculty, having dealt with students and colleagues for years, have seen it all, and can detect baloney and insincerity in a nanosecond."

Simply put, "if you don't know the answer to a question, say so-don't try to fake it," Marshall says. He adds that candidates should remember to keep answers to questions short and not to use them as an excuse to add several minutes to their presentation.

Tip 8: Work out the details. Developing a research proposal is not an easy task. It requires candidates to outline feasible research projects and provide some idea of the costs for doing the work. If either component is off, it could spell disaster.

Because no research proposal focuses on just one project, candidates should rank their proposed projects. "Make the first one achievable in one year, and also have some backup plans in case the hottest idea fails," Marshall suggests.

It's also important to be realistic about start-up packages. In interviewing a top prospect, Michael P. Doyle, chemistry professor at the University of Maryland, notes that although the research plan was excellent, the requested start-up costs were unreasonable.

When Doyle asked for a list of start-up costs, "the candidate reached into a folder and handed me a list whose bottom line exceeded any reasonable deliverable," he explains. "Obviously, the list had been prepared in consultation at the current institution without regard to what was available at Maryland and actual needs for a developing program." Doyle adds that they did make this candidate an offer with a revised start-up package, but he did not accept it.

Tip 9: Be your own person. It's important to remember that institutions are looking to hire you, not your mentor. "Demonstrate that you are not a clone of your research mentors with regard to your research ideas," Hoffman says. "Independence of creative thinking is sought in the world of academic scholarship."

Showing that you are a good researcher is also important to being your own person. "I can recall a particularly memorable seminar by a junior faculty candidate in the area of total synthesis," says Cynthia J. Burrows, chemistry professor at the University of Utah. "The candidate described numerous different synthetic routes—some quite elegant," she explains.

"But every one of them seemed to fail at the penultimate step, necessitating a completely new approach that essentially started over at the beginning," she says. Although she notes that he learned from these failures, it would have been nice to share some successes and end the presentation on a high note.

Tip 10: Always come prepared. In addition to knowing the details of past, current, and proposed research cold, it may not be a bad idea to bring along a granola bar.

ACS's assistant director of the Department of Career Management & Development, David E. Harwell, tells C&EN of an experience he had when interviewing for his previous academic position at the University of Hawaii. Harwell, who was traveling from mainland U.S. to Hawaii, arrived late in the evening. He was picked up by his host, who was going to take him to get something to eat, but as it turned out, it was a local holiday and everything was closed.

Harwell ended up staring down a pack of peanut butter crackers in the hotel vending machine. After scraping together some change, he was able to buy them. His experience shows that it never hurts to carry spare change.

EDUCATION SUPPLEMENT CONTENTS
Changing Times
Evolving The Doctorate Carnegie initiative inspires reshaping of Ph.D. programs to fit modern times.
Benefits
Maternity Leave For Graduate Students.
Lofty Goals
Describing The Doctorate.
Passport To Science Once outnumbered by humanities majors, science students are now studying abroad in force.
Global Science Corps
Program provides opportunities for established scientists to do research in developing countries.
Virtual Help
Study Abroad Web Resources.
No Substitute For Experience Chemical engineering students at all levels can benefit from 'learn and earn' opportunities.
10 Tips To Help You Get A Faculty Job Faculty from around the country share stories to help candidates 'ace' the interview process.
Chemical & Engineering News
ISSN 0009-2347
Copyright © 2006 American Chemical Society

6 comments:

Blog of FANG Liming----Research said...

Chemical & Engineering News 2006 Sept 4 issue Page 102-104
"10 Tips to help you get a faculty job"
http://pubs.acs.org/email/cen/html/101206094042.html

Physics Today 2006 Nov Issue Page 38-42
"Hunting for jobs at liberal arts colleges"

Blog of FANG Liming----Research said...

关于第一篇文章,我做过全文翻译,全文如下:

助你找到faculty职位的十个诀窍

(前言:对于马上即将博士毕业或博士后出站的学生学者朋友们来说,找工作的任务迫在
眉睫,而相当一部分将选择继续从事科学研究工作,这也就意味着下一步就是申请高校
faculty职位的艰巨工作。关于申请faculty的技巧,众说纷纭。有人说是靠老板和学校
的名气,有人说是靠自身的努力和发表的文章,还有人说很大程度上靠运气和高校运作情
况。最新一期的化学类新闻科普周刊Chemical & Engineering News发表了一篇名为"10
Tips to Help You Get a Faculty Job"的文章,文中提出了十个关于申请faculty的诀
窍,编者将其译成中文并将连载刊登,希望能够给予正在申请faculty的朋友们一点小小
的帮助。原文请参阅Chemical & Engineering News,2006,84(36),102-104。)

每年都有数以万计的博士毕业生和博士后小心翼翼的准备自己的简历,搜速各类广告来
寻找faculty职位,并在属于自己的领域内进行申请。但是只有对于很少一部分幸运的人
而言,他们的申请才会得到校园面试和最终赢得被雇用的机会。

虽然准备一份极具竞争力的简历,地毯式搜速可以申请的学校和研究机构,和焦急等待申
请的结果是一个压力重重的过程,但是校园面试才是一种最为特别的挑战。在此以后,申
请者只有一到两天时间来通过表现自己能够胜任领导一个研究计划、教各种不同的课程
和成为一名有价值的同僚等三个方面说服招聘委员会的教授们。

通过面试过程的确需要一些锻炼,但对于应征者而言,应该知道有一些事项应该去做或者
避免去做来增加自己成功的机会。为了帮助第一次应征者在面试过程中关于做和不做方
面提供一些有益的建议,本杂志在全国范围内的一些大型研究型高校里面咨询了一些
faculty关于一些有意义的面试故事,借此机会来大家共享他们的建议。以下是他们提供
的最重要的十个诀窍,次序不分先后。

诀窍1:运用一切可以获得的资源。应该不会感到惊讶,应征者投出更多的申请,得到工作
的机会也就越大。这一常识通用于所有应聘,当然也包括学术界的工作。但是为了申请,
应征者必须首先找到可以申请的职位。一个应征者的学术导师常常是提供给自己这个研
究领域的申请职位的一个最重要的资源。然而,学生和博士后往往犯的一个普遍错误就
是假定他们的导师能够帮他们找到工作,犹他大学有机化学教授Peter J.Stang指出,"导
师只能开门,而学生需要把握机会能够自己走进去。"

诀窍2:对于自己面世的学校,一定要花些时间去了解学校、申请院系和里面faculty的具
体情况。也许雇用一个私人研究员的过程还很遥远,但是花上一些时间去阅读系里
faculty的研究方向和了解学校和周围环境的情况还是很值得去做的。"不知道系里一些
重要研究人员的情况,不知道这个研究机构是公立还是私立,甚至对学校历史都了解很少
,对于申请来说将不会很有利。"波士顿大学已退休的化学教授Morton Z.Hoffman说。
Hoffman教授还举例说明一个到他们系进行面试的应征者甚至都不能完全确定波士顿大
学和波士顿学院的差别,这让Hoffman教授都想知道这位应征者是否知道今天自己究竟在
哪里。除了简单清楚自己在哪里以外,做好系里faculty的了解工作也是大有裨益的。"
我最喜欢的一个趣闻就是一个来俄亥俄州立大学应聘初等职位的应聘者,"佛罗里达州立
大学化学与生化教授Alan G.Marshall说。据Marshall所说,系里最有名的有机化学家要
求应聘者证明关于他的研究计划里面一个反应的可行性。"这位应聘者居然引用了这位
化学家本人的文章作为理论依据回答了这个问题,这一回答让面试取得了成功。"他说。
格言:应聘者应该对自己要去面试的研究机构的faculty研究方向做好充分的准备。

诀窍3:有礼貌,专业化,和热心。很显然,面试委员会是打算招聘能与他们建立关系并且
能代表他们系的应聘者。他们需要的应聘者不但聪明,而且非常友善,还懂得一些社交技
巧。"我的一个非常优秀的博士后过去一直存在着面试的问题,"哥伦比亚大学化学教授
Ronald Breslow解释道。在与他参与面试的同僚们交谈后,Breslow得知他的博士后是"
用一种保守而又冷漠的态度来表达他的工作和想法。"Breslow帮助那位博士后找到用热
情的方式表达工作的方法后,经过一些练习,他取得了"巨大的成功。"正如Breslow所说,
此后他的那位博士后被察觉带有一点紧张的进入面试,不久就找到了职位。加州理工大
学化学教授Harry B.Gray告诉本杂志一个类似的故事。Gray教授说,通常很难在短短的
面试期间判断一个应聘者,有时候一些看起来很冷漠的才华横溢的应聘者往往还比不上
那些成就不及他们但面试表现优秀的人。反馈的信息告诉我们,除了要展现自己的科研
成就,还需要集中与faculty们建立起关系。与他们建立关系的一部分包括社交技巧。"
虽然你会因为在复杂的晚宴上不懂使用餐叉而得到原谅,但是不要表现出你是个毫无任
何社交礼仪的粗俗汉,"Hoffman教授说。"尽管晚宴的交谈远离你最新的研究成果,但是
对你而言来了解世界形势和当前政治还是很有帮助的,"他建议道。专业化和慎重对待面
试也是很重要的。南佛罗里达大学有机化学教授兼GreenPoint Science咨询顾问
Douglas J.Raber告诉本杂志他曾经去机场接一位来应聘faculty的应征者。当这位应征
者一下飞机,他马上就问这里离佛罗里达旅游地Everglades有多远。"我们马上意识到他
对于南佛罗里达的职位并没有真正的兴趣,而只是打算利用这个机会来佛罗里达度个短
假罢了。"Raber解释道。

诀窍4:带上一面镜子备用。再一次强调,这可能看起来是非常普遍,但真人真事的确存在
,有的应征者做报告的时候裤子拉链没拉上或者牙齿上还粘有食物。这些貌似简单但有
失检点的行为却能够让人迷惑不解,从而导致应征者失去一个工作机会。"曾经一个应征
者忘记剪掉自己新西装上面的线头,"德州农机大学化学教授Marcetta Y.Darensbourg说
。"出于某些原因,听众往往不能集中于化学,反而仅仅知道这位应征者身上多了个东西,
"她说。

诀窍5:让自己的报告有针对性和准时。标准的报告除了不仅仅只是把带有很多字的幻灯
片订在一起并读给听众,很多和本杂志联系的faculty还强调报告不能过长的重要性。"
应征者应该对自己的报告进行关于时间和内容方面的练习,"Darensbourg教授建议。她
回忆曾经一个应征者把自己的报告拖长了二十五分钟。那是这位应征者的第一次面试,
她指出,虽然每个人都打算在他们的第一个面试中给应征者一些时间上的弥补,但是实在
太长的报告使得这位应征者大打折扣。为了强调这一点,Hoffman教授说,"如果你的演讲
规定是一个小时,那么你应该计划做个四十五分钟的报告,从而让你自己能够被提出的问
题打断和留下足够的时间给予讨论。"他还补充道"占用所有的规定时间而让人无法提问
是个不好的习惯,"因为面试委员会的faculty可能会想这样做是否是经过深思熟虑的。"
没有其他事情比一个应征者用光所有时间在每一个可能的计划上而不留任何时间给予讨
论更为恼火的,"Marshall同意上述观点。"提问和回答的阶段对于应征者来说是一个展
现自己能力来踱步思考和显示自己在幻灯片之外的知识能力的最佳机会,"他解释道。
诀窍6:不要担心在你报告中加入一些科学的动画效果。做一个报告不应该是一个翻动幻
灯片的枯燥过程。事实上,Darensbourg说,当她自己应聘职位参加面试的时候,她都带上
一个道具。"我带着一个大的分子结构模型来指出反应点,它将为我在解释的时候带来一
个机会和听众有眼神上的交流,"她说。而且,虽然幻灯片报告那种炫耀的魅力已经被熟
知,但是使用道具依然可能是一个行为有效的方法。科学的动画效果也可以被用于报告
中来,其中包括报告中某张幻灯片上的错误和更正,康乃尔大学化学教授Ronald
Hoffmann说。"这将给大家留下印象,这人不但只会读他的幻灯片,而且还在思考他正在
做的报告,"他指出。

诀窍7:不要不懂装懂。虽然引入一些科学的动画效果也许是有帮助的,但是应征者应该
谨慎而不要表现过头了。Stang教授告诉本杂志他看到很多年轻的应征者用绚烂夺目的
幻灯片。"一个好的幻灯片固然不错,但是应征者必须清楚绚烂夺目不能掩盖科学,"他告
诫道。最后,面试的faculty会寻找那些真正懂得科学的应征者。"不要试图迷惑招聘委
员会的成员,"Hoffman教授说。"Faculty,已经和学生和同僚们打了数年的交道,完全清
楚一切,能在极短的时间内鉴别出夸夸其谈和不真实的东西。"简单说来,"如果你不知道
问题的答案,就说不知道――不要试图不懂装懂,"Marshall教授说。他指出应征者应该
记住使答案简短而不要试图利用更多的时间作为借口来回避问题。

诀窍8:设计出具体方案。设计一个研究计划并不是一件容易的事情。它需要应征者规划
出可行性研究方案和提供出这些方案所需要的资金花费。如果任何一项不能成立,那么
整个计划将都是空想。因为没有研究计划仅仅集中于某个方案,所以应征者需要对他们
的可行方案进行排序。"一年内先实现第一个,万一这个失败还能有其它方案进行候补。
"Marshall教授建议。对于启动经费的现实主义也是非常重要的。马里兰大学化学教授
Michael P.Doyle指出,在曾经面试一个很好的研究计划的时候,虽然研究计划很优秀,但
所需要的启动花费却是过高的。当Doyle教授询问一系列启动花费的时候,"那位应征者
拿出一个文件夹,递给我一个系列的经费,而它的底线却超过任何一个合理的启动经费方
案,"他解释道。"显然,这个系列经费是在咨询了他当前学校的基础上制定出来的,但是
却没有考虑到马里兰大学的可行性和一个发展规划的实际需要。"Doyle教授还说他们重
新制定了新的启动经费计划来吸引这个应征者接受他们所提供的职位,但他没有接受。

诀窍9:表现你真实的自我。请记住一个重要的事情,研究机构是希望雇用你而不是你的
导师。"尽量在你个人研究想法方面表现出你不是你研究导师的一个没有个人想法而只
会机械劳动的机器人,"Hoffman教授说,"创造性的独立思考是全世界学者们所追求的。"
表现出你是一个好的研究工作者对于表现真实的自我也是非常重要的。"我能回忆一个
在全合成领域的初级faculty应征者的一个特别难忘的报告,"犹他大学化学教授Cynthia
J.Burrows说道。"那位应征者描述了不同的合成路线,其中一些非常巧妙,"她解释道。
"但是它们每个似乎都在倒数第二步失败了,而需要一个全新的方法从头开始,"她说。她
指出虽然那个应征者遭遇了很多失败,但是他从中吸取经验进而带来成功和大家分享,最
后这个报告得到了高分。

诀窍10:时刻做好准备。除了知道过去、现在和将来的研究,时刻做好准备也不是一种坏
的打算。美国化学会职业管理与发展部门主管助理David E.Harwell告诉本杂志他自己
的一个曾经去夏威夷大学面试学术职位的经历。Harwell从美国本土飞往夏威夷,晚间才
到达。接他的人本打算带他去吃点东西,但是事与愿违,那天正好是当地的一个节日而所
有的地方都关门。Harwell最终考虑购买旅馆自动售货机里面的食物。在与这些突发事
件的斗争后,他决定购买食物。他的经历表明善于随机应变才能更好的保护自己。

Blog of FANG Liming----Research said...

so you want to be a professor
AIP

http://mitbbs.com/mitbbs_article.php?board=Macromolecules&id=22479850&ap=167092

resume

Matthew E. Anderson

Postdoctoral Fellow

The Institute of Optics, University of Rochester

Rochester, NY 14627



phone: (716) 275-2328 e-mail: slambo@optics.rochester.edu










--------------------------------------------------------------------------------






OBJECTIVE

To obtain a tenure-track teaching position at a university that focuses on education and research.
EDUCATION
Doctor of Philosophy
Physics, January 1998, University of Oregon
Department of Physics and Oregon Center for Optics, Eugene, Oregon.

Dissertation: "Squeezing in nonlinear optical waveguides." Adviser: Michael G. Raymer.
Bachelor of Science
Physics, June 1990, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Minor in film and video production.
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Postdoctoral Fellow
Researcher with Prof. Ian Walmsley, University of Rochester, 1998 - present.
Recorded fastest update rate for measurement of ultrashort laser pulses using real-time SPIDER.
Observed spontaneous molecule formation in a Cs magneto-optic trap, a first step towards quantum control of cold molecules.
Helped manage and advise group of 10 graduate students on thesis research and obtaining employment.
Built numerous devices including blue SPIDER, real-time SPIDER, and The Ultralock 2000 (beam pointing stabilizer).
Instructor, University of Rochester, Spring 1999.
Co-taught Optics 100 (introductory optics) with Prof. Turan Erdogan.
Course covered geometrical, physical, and quantum optics.
Created lesson plans, lectured, wrote homework and exams, created in-class demonstrations.
Instructor, Rochester Institute of Technology, Fall 1998.
Taught introductory physics labs: mechanics, circuits, waves.
Wrote homework assignments, exams, and assigned grades.
Graduate Student
Research Assistant, Prof. Mike Raymer抯 Laboratory, University of Oregon, 1993 - 1997.
First measurement (and current record) of squeezing in c(2) waveguides.
First measurement of ultrafast photon statistics of a diode laser and microcavity polariton-exciton.
Built Ti:Sapphire ultrafast laser system including chirped-pulse regenerative amplifier.
Fully integrated computer control of experiment using LabView.
Volunteer Assistant, Prof. Ray Frey, University of Oregon, Fall 1994.
Guest lectured and taught problem sessions for general physics.
Graduate Teaching Fellow, University of Oregon, 1990-1993.
Taught microcomputer-based introductory physics labs.









Frequent contributor, Prof. David Sokoloff's Save Our Schools
program, University of Oregon.
Contributed to continuing education program for high school science teachers.
Demonstrated optical physics ideas to teachers and students.
Frequent volunteer, Outreach program, University of Oregon.
Guest lecturer at local elementary and middle schools.
PROFESSIONAL SOCIETY ACTIVITIES
Co-director, Holography Booth, APS Centennial Meeting in Atlanta, March 1999.
Part of the APS Centennial Exhibit, sponsored by the Division of Laser Science.
Made hundreds of personal-item holograms with visitors, to rave reviews.
Helped design, transport, build, and run the holography darkroom.
Published Photograph
"White light generation in water using ultrashort, near-infrared laser pulses," M. E. Anderson, After Image Photograph, Optics and Photonics News (August, 1996).
Memberships
Optical Society of America.
American Physical Society.
Reviewer
Reviewed manuscripts for Physical Review A, Optics Letters, Optics Express, Applied Physics B.
Presider
Optical Society of America Annual Meeting, Santa Clara, California (1999).
President
Oregon Society of Physics Students (1992).
REFEREED PUBLICATIONS
"The effects of noise on ultrashort optical pulse reconstruction using SPIDER," M. E. Anderson, L. E. E. de Araujo, E. M. Kosik and I. A. Walmsley, submitted to Applied Physics B special issue on ultrafast optics (1999).
"Real-time ultrashort pulse measurement," M. E. Anderson, T. M. Shuman, C. Iaconis and I. A. Walmsley, to appear in Optics & Photonics News?Optics in ?9 issue, (Dec. 1999).

"Real-time SPIDER: ultrashort optical pulse measurement at 20 Hz," T. M. Shuman, M. E. Anderson, J. Bromage, C. Iaconis, L. Waxer and I. A. Walmsley, Optics Express 5, 134 (1999).

"Pulsed squeezed-light generation in c(2)nonlinear waveguides," M. E. Anderson, D. F. McAlister, M. G. Raymer and M. C. Gupta, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 14, 3180 (1997).

"Quadrature squeezing with ultrashort pulses in nonlinear-optical waveguides," M. E. Anderson, M. Beck, M. G. Raymer and J. D. Bierlein, Opt. Lett. 20, 620 (1995).

"Photon-number statistics from the phase-averaged quadrature-field distribution: Theory and ultrafast measurement," M. Munroe, D. Boggavarapu, M. E. Anderson and M. G. Raymer, Phys. Rev. A Rap. Comm. 52, R924 (1995).



PATENT
"Kinetically multicolored light source," #5,844,377 issued Dec. 1, 1998.
CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS
"Ultrafast balanced-homodyne chronocyclic spectrometer," M. E. Anderson, M. Munroe, U. Leonhardt, D. Boggavarapu, D. F. McAlister and M. G. Raymer, proceedings of Generation, Amplification, and Measurement of Ultrafast Laser Pulses III, San Jose, SPIE Vol. 2701, p. 142 (1996).
"High-efficiency, ultrafast photon-number statistics from phase-averaged homodyne detection," M. Munroe, D. Boggavarapu, M. E. Anderson, U. Leonhardt and M. G. Raymer, Coherence and Quantum Optics VII, edited by J. Eberly, L. Mandel, and E. Wolf (Plenum, New York, 1996).

"Ultrafast photon statistics of normal mode coupling in a semiconductor microcavity," D. Boggavarapu, D. F. McAlister, M. E. Anderson, M. Munroe, M. G. Raymer, H. Gibbs and G. Khitrova, proceedings of QELS, (Optical Society of America, 1996).

"Parametric amplification and squeezing in quasi-phase-matched waveguides," M. E. Anderson, M. Beck, M. G. Raymer and J. D. Bierlein, proceedings of Nonlinear Guided Waves and Their Applications, (Optical Society of America, 1995).

"Ultrafast, time-resolved photon number statistics," M. Munroe, D. Boggavarapu, M. E. Anderson, and M. G. Raymer, proceedings of QELS, (Optical Society of America, 1995).

"Imaging through scattering media using pulsed homodyne detection," M. Beck, M. E. Anderson and M. G. Raymer, proceedings of Advances in Optical Imaging and Photon Migration, Orlando (1994).

"Measurement of the Wigner function in quantum optics," M. G. Raymer, D. T. Smithey, M. Beck, M. E. Anderson and D. F. McAlister, proceedings of the Third International Wigner Symposium, Oxford (Sep. 1993).



PRESENTATIONS
"Really fast spiders: Ultrafast pulse measurement in real time," invited presentation at the Industrial Associates Meeting, The Institute of Optics, Rochester, New York, 1999.
"The effects of noise and phase-matching bandwidth on pulse reconstruction using SPIDER," Optical Society of America Annual Meeting, Santa Clara, California, 1999.

"Squeezing in quasi-phase-matched LiTaO3waveguides and red loss induced by blue two-photon absorption," Optical Society of America Annual Meeting, Rochester, New York, 1996.

"Squeezed light: cutting the quantum noise," invited presentation at the University of Oregon Chemical Physics Institute Retreat, Charleston, Oregon, 1996.

"Quadrature squeezing in nonlinear optical waveguides," Optical Society of America Annual Meeting, Portland, Oregon, 1995.

"Parametric amplification and squeezing in quasi-phase-matched waveguides," Nonlinear Guided Waves and Their Applications, Dana Point, California, 1995.

"Squeezing with ultrashort lasers pulses in bulk crystals and waveguides," Optical Society of America Annual Meeting, Dallas, Texas, 1994.

"Imaging through scattering media using pulsed homodyne detection," Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, Anaheim, California, 1994.



AWARDS AND HONORS
Received Department of Education Fellowship (1992 - 1994).
Received New Focus Travel Grant (CLEO 1994).
First place, U. of Oregon Physics Dept. Talent Show (1994, 1995, 1996).
Lifeguard of the Year, Del Mar, CA (1987).
PERSONAL
Junior Lifeguard Instructor, Del Mar, CA (1986 - 1990).
World Bodysurfing Champion, 12-14 age group (1981).
Hobbies: Film and video production, volleyball, basketball, soccer, hiking and camping with my wife, playing frisbee with my dog.

Blog of FANG Liming----Research said...

http://mitbbs.com/mitbbs_article.php?board=Macromolecules&id=22479850&ap=180613



Research History and Future Plans

Research History:

Shortly after joining Professor Raymer抯 research group at the University of Oregon, I realized that optics was the place to be. Optics experiments are self-contained. They are effective on a small scale and the results are generally immediate. My first few years were spent primarily building a Ti:Sapphire laser system with our postdoc Mark Beck (now a professor at Whitman College). Construction of this system took place from the ground up. We started with a completely empty optics table and proceeded to build, buy, and borrow everything. I learned a lot about building a lab and have a huge respect for the effort involved.

I participated in a diverse range of experiments in Raymer抯 lab. From imaging through scattering media to measuring Wigner functions to ultrafast photon statistics of microcavity structures, we utilized our laser and measurement techniques fully. The work we did with VCSELs grown by Gibbs and Khitrova at Arizona was the first demonstration of a measurement technique to record the ultrafast photon statistics of a microcavity polariton-exciton.

My thesis work was on squeezed light generation. Specifically, I was able to demonstrate the first measurement of squeezing in a chi(2) nonlinear optical waveguide. In fact I still hold the record for squeezing in this geometry, obtained in LiTaO3 waveguides in a collaboration with Mool Gupta of Kodak (now at Old Dominion). This work helped me fully understand the delicacies of quantum optics experiments.



Joining the Institute of Optics for my postdoctoral work has been an outstanding experience. The Institute is considered by many to be the premiere optics department in the world and I now understand why. The faculty and students here are extremely motivated and there is a unique sense of comraderie between them. Naturally, I have learned a great deal of optics here.

My research has been primarily leading towards one goal: quantum control of cold molecules. In order to achieve this, we have concentrated our efforts on building several major components: a magneto-optic trap (MOT), a pulse shaping apparatus, a real-time measurement technique, a beam-pointing stabilizer, and a detection system. The only component we have not yet completed is the acousto-optic pulse shaper, but this should be finished soon. We have already demonstrated the first real-time pulse measurement technique using SPIDER. We have also observed spontaneous molecule formation in our Cs MOT. The pieces of the puzzle required for quantum control are fitting nicely into place, and we expect new results (and new publications) in the next six months.



Future Plans:

My long-term research goals are to continue this trek towards optical control of quantum systems and engage the question: Can we ultimately dictate an atom or molecule抯 behavior? To make this journey, however, several steps must be implemented. An experiment this complex requires equipment and expertise. Therefore, a more realistic near-term goal is one in which undergraduates and graduate students would be ideally suited: Building a cost-effective ultrafast laser, pulse shaper, and real-time measurement system.

In the first year, I hope to build the laser and pulse measurement system. The laser system would likely be an ultrafast fiber laser of the Hermann Haus variety. The measurement system would be an adaptation of SPIDER. Since this fiber laser operates at 1.5 祄, this would provide an excellent test of SPIDER抯 capabilities since it has never been used at this wavelength. Undoubtedly there would be interest in this result because of the obvious communications applications. Furthermore, I have recently identified a unique property of SPIDER that allows spectral phase reconstruction using a detector that has one-bit precision! The experimental verification of this would be a straightforward yet worthy achievement. When these first steps are completed, I will then concentrate on developing a pulse shaper and finally return to the task of probing and controlling atoms and molecules with the laser system. The whole system will be tied together with a feedback loop (for learning control) such as one based on a genetic algorithm. Questions that remain to be answered vary from the specific to the general: What are the effects of chirp on the molecular production rate in atom traps? What are the fundamental limitations to quantum control? How will our physical understanding of light-matter interactions benefit from learning control experiments?

I believe this course is achievable even with limited funding. There has been steady progress in ultrafast fiber lasers, the most expensive component of which is a suitable pump source. With high-power diode lasers, this cost can be kept to a reasonable level. I estimate a fiber ultrafast system could be constructed for under $10k. For the measurement technique, real-time SPIDER seems a natural choice. The most expensive components are a nonlinear crystal and diffraction gratings. This could be built for around $5k. A pulse shaper could also be constructed for a reasonable price. Methods employing liquid crystal modulators seem the obvious choice here (cheaper than the acousto-optic variety), with a total cost of approximately $5k. Finally, Carl Wiemann et al. have written a paper which describes how to make an atom-trap in a vapor cell for under $3k. I have analyzed this sytem and determined that it could be an optimal system for both undergraduates and graduate students alike.

Once other optical components and an optical table are factored in, the total cost is probably approaching $50-60k in equipment. However, there might be opportunities to work with corporate sponsors to secure donations. Several companies are highly interested in these techniques so there is a possible avenue for funding from corporate associates. A colleague indicated that companies sometimes donate equipment to enterprising educational ventures. To this end, I have a number of contacts with optics companies, who would likely be receptive to aiding a university which might provide quality employees. This could provide a straightforward means for university/corporate dialogue.

The goals for involving undergraduates and graduate students are very simple. They will construct these devices and in the process learn about pulsed lasers, measurement techniques, controlling properties of light such as the spectral phase, and trapping and cooling of atoms. There is still a great deal of room for experimentation in this arena, with obvious payoffs in publications, exposure, and students getting educated on the hot topics in physics.





http://mitbbs.com/mitbbs_article.php?board=Macromolecules&id=22479850&ap=188176


Teaching Philosophy and History







Teaching Philosophy:

I believe that students need to be challenged, but I do not believe that the challenges in a physics curriculum are the same as in other disciplines. Many subjects rely on rote memorization of facts or formulas. Students take notes furiously and then memorize what they have written down to "prepare" for the exams. To challenge these students, simply more information is thrown at them. In physics I believe the exact opposite approach is warranted. The challenge is to throw less information and formulas, but more understanding. Physics is, of course, built on the notion that a few physical laws govern the world around us. Once a student has mastered these principles, he or she may better understand a huge variety of problems, both inside and outside of physics.

I try to follow one simple rule when I teach: Get one idea across to my students per lecture (conservation of energy, conservation of momentum, light is made of photons, etc.). If my students can leave the classroom understanding that one simple statement, they will have a better grasp on the homework, perform better on the exams, and will ultimately inherit a deeper overall comprehension of physics. The problem is that students often want to simply write down notes and memorize them later. I prefer to consider a slightly different approach. In my classes I encourage students to not take notes, but to sit and listen to the lecture and actually think about the concept at hand. I provide the lecture notes to them separately so they won抰 miss anything, and I believe this approach works for the majority of students. Physics is a difficult field, but it doesn抰 have to be frightening. Students are generally more relaxed when they are not trying to keep up with transcribing the lecture.

Physics is about mastering concepts. I have met many people who have gone through college physics and still do not really understand conservation of energy and momentum. Yet the simple principles of physics can provide huge insight into everyday problems. This is another way to reach students: connect physics to "reality." I have found that students respond favorably when I connect physics to real-life situations. For instance, in the physics labs at Oregon we did an easy experiment to measure the difference between static friction and kinetic friction. I told them this was an extremely interesting result, and one of my students asked me why. They were amazed to learn that this is the fundamental principle behind anti-lock brakes! Suddenly the principle held more importance, and I抦 positive they remembered it more fully.

I believe this is the first goal of a physics teacher, to get this simple message across to their students: The principles are what抯 important; think about the concepts first, the mathematics second. If they can realize that, then they have a shot at actually understanding physics. The hard question is: How do you get your students to think? This is indeed the biggest challenge that a college professor faces. I believe the answer lies in the professor抯 own attitude. The old adage is true: Teachers teach best by example. What students pick up on is the professor抯 enthusiasm for the subject, the professor抯 whimsical curiosity. Professors that are truly motivated by the subject can easily convey this to their students. Research and teaching are not mutually exclusive, because often it is the professor抯 research that sustains the enthusiasm for physics. Staying active in research is a great way to convey this motivation to your students.

Challenging your students to think about what they observe in everyday situations is a great way to open their minds. For instance, I asked my students to sit far from a computer monitor and chew on a pretzel. I asked them what they observed, and they said that the screen flickered. I asked them if they could correlate the flicker with anything else that was happening, and pretty soon they realized that chewing on the pretzels caused the flicker (although a few were convinced I was doing it somehow). They were very surprised to learn the cause of the flicker : Chewing on the pretzel caused their head (and eyes) to shake at a frequency close to the update rate of the computer monitor which causes aliasing. I believe that demonstrations such as this stimulate and help motivate students to question what they observe.

Another way to keep yourself and your students motivated is to continually think up new approaches to teaching. My primary approach is to conjure up interesting new in-class demonstrations. I have found that for undergraduate teaching, a demonstration that is part physics / part magic show has great appeal. Students like to be entertained. They are more focused when they are intrigued by the demonstration, and generally more likely to ask questions. I try to do in-class demonstrations at least every other lecture, and some recent optics demonstrations are described in the next section.



Teaching History:

It was an honor to co-teach Introductory Optics with Professor Turan Erdogan last Spring term. He is a superior instructor and I was able to learn a lot from him. He is very easy to work with, and together we taught a great course.

I believe optics is actually one of the premiere disciplines for effective in-class demonstrations and student laboratories. The experiments are generally simple and do not require a lot of sophisticated electronics. Plus the nature of optics lends itself to more interesting demonstrations. It is visual. Let me describe just a few of the demonstrations we did in Introductory Optics last Spring:

1) Jell-O optics: This is a great way for students to visualize optical devices. We made a large pan of clear gelatin dessert (triple strength), then cut out shapes from the pan. We pre-fabricated and also had the students fabricate lenses, prisms and "fiber-optic" waveguides. Using a HeNe laser, the students could arrange the pieces on the table with fascinating results, like joining pieces together to simulate a fiber coupler. The Jell-O scatters enough light that the beams are clearly visible which helps the students understand what is actually happening inside.

2) Speed of light measurement: We put a great new spin on this classic demonstration. Using a pulsed diode laser, a fast detector, and a good oscilloscope, we had the students measure the speed of light in the classroom. The laser pulse propagated across the room and back (just 30 ft. or so) and we measured the time difference on the scope. We had the students align it and measure the distance and propagation time. They calculated a value for c that was within 2% of the accepted value!

3) The optical record player: It is possible to "play" a record using a laser beam. This is done by focusing a HeNe laser onto a single groove of the record and then picking off the reflected beam. This reflected beam is modulated by the record groove抯 modulation, and thus contains musical information. By using a standard photodiode hooked to an audio amplifier, you can actually hear the record! The only problem is our device doesn抰 "track" so the record continually skips, but the audio quality is usually high enough to recognize the tune. Much to our students chagrin, they were able to recognize our Bee Gees album.

These are just a sample of the more than 20 demonstrations we did that term. The kids seem to really enjoy them and they grew to be much more vocal after participating in the measurements.

For the lectures, Professor Erdogan and I split the duties down the middle. He would lecture for a few days, then I would lecture for a few days. It worked quite well, and the students seemed to enjoy the change from one to another. The course covered introductory optics in the broadest sense. We gave our students a "flavor" for what comprises the field of optics. Starting from "light is a ray," moving on to "light is a wave," and ending with "light is a photon," we emphasized the physical nature of light in its many forms. We focused on lenses and imaging, diffraction, lasers, cameras, the human eye, wave-particle duality, and a plethora of other topics. I felt very comfortable lecturing in front of this group of 20 students, many of whom I still see around campus.

Ever since I first started teaching junior lifeguards on the beach in Del Mar, I knew that I wanted to continue teaching. In college I tutored students regularly. In graduate school I taught several introductory physics labs and helped teach a general physics lecture. Here in Rochester I taught physics labs at the Rochester Institute of Technology and Introductory Optics here at the Institute. In all my experience, there is nothing that compares to seeing the students?eyes light up after finally understanding a difficult concept. This is the true reward of teaching.

Blog of FANG Liming----Research said...

http://nature.berkeley.edu/~gong/Acadjobhunt.pdf

"Working in the Academics"
by Peng Gong
Department of ESPM
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720

http://www.hhmi.org/resources/labmanagement/mtrmoves_download.html

"Making the Right Moves: A Practical Guide to Scientific Management for
Postdocs and New Faculty"
Second edition

Blog of FANG Liming----Research said...

Job Search in Academe:
Strategic Rhetorics for Faculty Job Candidates
by Dawn M. Formo

The Academic Job Search Handbook (3rd Edition)
by Mary Morris Heiberger, Julia Miller Vick